Nitwit Internal vs External Locus of Control

Many people were looking for a few specific reasons to rationalize their unsatisfying results like, "player X made quads against my full-house". That is part of the game. Until they understood that the results of any hand are almost irrelevant Yiay cu cuirecily, ine iaea was slow to QA old.

At different levels of learning the game, most people will not have the resources to make correct decisions, yet the rules of the game force them to decide. There are at most only three choices: If there is a bet you can Fold, Raise, or Call; if there is no bet you can Check, or Bet (folding should not be an option even though people still do it.

The decision does not seem complicated enough to preclude someone from making it. However, if a player actually knew all the thought that should go into most decisions, it would freeze their thinking and they would lock up faster than an old computer.

Many players with an external locus of control will make a decision based upon how they feel the results will turn out. For instance, do they think that their flush draw is going to hit? Has one of the poker gods whispered in their ear that a running low is going to come?

It can be very difficult to pattern-type the play of an opponent who is making whimsical decisions. Now you know one reason that they do it, and should not be surprised when you witness it. You do not need to trick or deceive one of these opponents often, as their guidance comes from a virtually "random decision making generator".

They should be interesting, and profitable to gamble with, however. This perception affects quality of life and the sooner a person can move toward an internal locus of control, the more enriched his life will be.

Using a person's locus of control you will be able to make some broad assumptions about how an opponent should behave and gives you a quick method of grasping his likely skill level.

analyze a person's

the poker students

levels of learning the game